Inland port plans prompt questions on train traffic through Orangeburg

2012-09-10T04:15:00Z Inland port plans prompt questions on train traffic through OrangeburgBy PHIL SARATA, T&D Staff Writer The Times and Democrat
September 10, 2012 4:15 am  • 

Orangeburg Mayor Pro Tem Bernard Haire wants to know how a planned inland port will affect train traffic through the city of Orangeburg, but Norfolk Southern Railroad says it doesn’t know yet.

“Many of us have heard and I have been informed that with the new inland port in Greer, the city of Orangeburg will be receiving additional train traffic,” Haire said. “In the past we have had some discussion with regard to the speed of the train coming through Orangeburg.

“I’m still concerned about the speed. I want to ask the administrator to get some information on whether or not these trains are going to be longer.”

The South Carolina State Ports Authority plans to develop the inland port with Norfolk Southern. The project is designed to improve container movement between the Port of Charleston, the Upstate and neighboring states.

Haire raised the issue during last week’s regular Orangeburg City Council meeting. City Administrator John Yow said he would try to get back to council on the matter.

“We want a resolution on the train speed and what their plans are to have limited effect on the community,” Yow said. “We will see if they will meet with us on that as well.”

Haire has taken Norfolk Southern to task on various issues in the past, including the speed of trains traveling through Orangeburg. He has complained trains sometimes block city street crossings for more than five minutes, contrary to city code.

“I don’t feel our city needs to be put upon as it relates having the danger of spillage because of the speed of the trains coming through,” Haire said.

Norfolk Southern spokesman Robin Chapman said it’s still too early in the process to determine how much additional train traffic the new inland port will generate.

“Federal law, which governs train speeds under interstate commerce, pre-empts local ordinances so as to preserve the fluidity of the nation’s railroad networks,” Chapman said in an email.

Contact the writer: psarata@times anddemocrat.com or 803-533-5540.

Copyright 2015 The Times and Democrat. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. Bulkyelbows
    Report Abuse
    Bulkyelbows - September 10, 2012 5:49 pm
    Whatever happened to the inland port that was to be located in the Santee area? Anybody know?
  2. cherokee
    Report Abuse
    cherokee - September 10, 2012 9:31 am
    Orangeburg has several problems that need addressing: 1. Closing Zan, Peasly, and the one behind McDonalds. This is due to the closeness of Hwy. 601 and the train tracks,

    Orangeburg should investigate the possibility of increasing the time of the gate and alarm activation. Currently the time is approximately 20 seconds between activation and the arrival of the train. A suggested time should be at least 30 seconds in order to clear the tracks prior to the arrival of the train.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Businesses

Poll

Loading…

Does Lindsey Graham get your vote in a presidential election?

View Results