Children are the future of S.C.
By BILL CONNOR Friday, November 28, 2008In the past few months, I’ve been amazed at the increasingly negative hyperbole from those opposed to any form of school choice. The rhetoric is becoming predictable: “Anyone in support of school choice is driven by money from outside interest groups.” And, “those supporting school choice just don’t care about the poor children of South Carolina and issues like the ‘corridor of shame.’” And, “The voucher and tax credit schemes have been shot down by South Carolinians as a dubious agenda of helping the rich save a few bucks.” The divisiveness of these attacks has become shameful and quite unproductive. Many people hold a sincere conviction for tax credits for private education. As the school board chairman of a low-tuition private Christian school located near the ‘corridor of shame,” I’d like to offer my perspective.
While I was deployed to Afghanistan last year, my oldest daughter began attending the fifth grade at Orangeburg Christian Academy. OCA is a private Christian school just outside the city limits of Orangeburg. The teachers are selfless and dedicated individuals who make an average salary well below that of public school teachers (and none of the state benefits). The students are great kids from varied racial and socioeconomic backgrounds. The parents are primarily hard-working men and women who care deeply about their children’s education and character. Many families are willing to tighten belts in other areas of life to give their children a Christian education. The tuition at OCA runs about $3,000 a year, though this figure varies a bit based on the grade level. It can be compared to the $11,480 of combined tax money for students in public school.
Back to my daughter. When I was able to speak with my family from overseas, I discovered a new joy in my daughter’s voice due to her Christian school environment. In particular, she had made a new best friend I will call “S” (to respect the privacy of the family). “S” was an intelligent and well-mannered girl from a hard-working African-American family. My daughter spoke about her all the time. I came back to America about the time the school year ended but had the pleasure of meeting “S.” She was a great companion to my daughter and I looked forward to both of them continuing their friendship through the years.
During the summer, I was invited to become the OCA school board chairman and happily accepted. In meeting all the wonderful teachers, parents and students, I felt passionate about volunteering to help in any way possible. From my association with OCA and learning about other such schools, I decided to donate all my profits from a book I wrote (“Articles From War”) to low-tuition Christian schools.
When classes started back for the students of OCA, my daughter and I were crushed. It turned out that her new best friend could not return to OCA because her parents could no longer afford the tuition. I quickly discovered many parents in a similar situation; on the financial edge within the family budget to keep their children at OCA. Later, when the financial crisis hit, Principal Cynthia Poor told me about the hardship on parents trying to keep kids at OCA. One father had broken down in tears because he could no longer afford to keep his children in private school. As a faithful believer, he desperately wanted his kids to receive a Christian education.
When some of our parents recommended a change to a four-day week to save money, our board quickly met about the issue. There were a number of pros and cons to the change, but as chairman the decisive factor was the families being able to afford school. We decided in favor of a four-day week and Ms. Poor implemented that change. There were a number of issues to consider and much work to make it reality. However, for Ms. Poor and the board it was a labor of love. After what I had seen and experienced with low-tuition Christian education, I was willing to do anything to help these families.
Examples of the struggles described at OCA abound in low-tuition private schools throughout South Carolina. This is why I support tax credits.
For those with the resources, a tax credit is likely not the factor preventing private education. However, for many working families it can make the decisive difference. In addition, it makes financial sense for the state. We spend $11,480 in local, state and federal taxes for each child in public education in South Carolina. Doesn’t it make sense to offer a $2,000 tax credit if that will mean one less child to pay for in public school?
It has been argued that those favoring tax credits don’t care about the children in South Carolina. That just isn’t true. With tax credits, we are all still responsible for South Carolina’s children. A fewer number of children in public school would not only be funded by their parents and other adults without children, they would also be funded by affluent parents of children in private school. The main difference is that working parents would have an easier time making the same choice as wealthy parents. Isn’t that fair to all?
Attorney Bill Connor of Orangeburg is author of the book, “Articles From War” about his experiences in Afghanistan. The book is available for order at www.billconnoronline.com.
To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.



beamer22 wrote on Dec 5, 2008 4:32 PM:
Not everyone can afford to send their child to a good daycare or child development center. However, those that can, do so, and they get a tax credit for it...
Seems that is not the case with private school education.
Good job Mr. Connor. Keep up the good work, and please continue to share your opinions... Your thoughts, even though I usually disagree with them, spark discussion of issues we often forget about... "
confisus_sum wrote on Dec 5, 2008 2:47 PM:
holly wrote on Dec 4, 2008 10:59 PM:
confisus_sum wrote on Dec 4, 2008 4:59 PM:
cherokee wrote on Dec 4, 2008 7:49 AM:
To clarify the above statement, more non-public schools are needed for our children because of the prevalent trends in our public schools. Public schools are under staffed, have disruptive classes, offer fewer "high" profile courses in science, mathematics, and the English language. They are not properly funded in most cases due to the locations of the schools and, thus, do not have the opportunity to offer courses that our children need.
There is also the problem wherein various Districts and Schools within the District operate under different guidelines. The case, in point, is that all Districts and all schools must be properly funded, utilize qualified instructors, and operate under the same guidelines regardless of their location or school district. To not do this means that public schools cannot produce enough students with a "high" college potential. "
7141744 wrote on Nov 29, 2008 11:13 AM:
(E.Ray Moore) "
7141744 wrote on Nov 29, 2008 9:48 AM:
(E.R. Moore) "
connor wrote on Nov 29, 2008 7:45 AM:
Your response makes almost no sense beyond a defense against something not being argued (Note: Too bad this venue doesn't require the writer to put their actual name. I'm sensing quite a great deal of partisan agenda). I focused my argument toward the assistance of working families with kids in low-tuition Christian private school. I said nothing about public schools (which I attended growing up) beyond a comparison to show the hardships of low-tuition private school. I made the comparison of hardship because those against tax credits set the perception private schools as all rich families (vs. poor families in public school who are the only ones in struggles).
My argument:
1. I purposely do not recommend vouchers. Vouchers equals money the state "gives" private citizens. I am for smaller, more efficient government and vouchers become just another program expanding the size, influence of government. I want power and money with the people and not our rather inefficient gov't.
2. Tax credits are not vouchers. Tax credits equals the government not TAKING money earned by the citizen. It is the citizen's hard earned money and I am asking he be allowed to keep that money. Parents of kids in private school should keep their money because they are helping to educate the children of the state with personal resources. The state should recognize that sacrifice AND that each child not in public school means less resources required for public school.
3. Since we spent $11,480 in tax money for each child in public school, only $2000 of less tax revenue is a bargain. Once again, each child not in public school equals more resources/teachers per student.
4. This is fair. The $2000 is 2/3 the cost of tuition at a school like OCA. For the more affluent families, the $2000 is only a partial amount of their taxes. Those families are still paying for public school children, while educated their own privately.
5. MANY Christian (and other faith) parent's want their children to attend a school that can/does legally recognize God and Biblical values. It is down-right un-American to have a situation in which working parents can be prevented from Christian school due to the tax burden (that can become the deciding factor when families are stretched). This situation is not fair, and the reason I am putting my money where my mouth is with my book profits.
6. You will notice I did not personally attack those supporting public education. In fact, I said nothing about it beyond financial comparisons. In particular, I did not even HINT at public school teachers losing benefits or pay. My passion is to help raise the salaries/benefits of private school teachers so there can be some equity. What is wrong with that?
Anyway, I hope the other side can quit the personal attacks and ridiculous hyperbole. Both sides feel passion for good reason. Let's keep this thing about facts and not emotion.
Bill Connor "
fhsmct wrote on Nov 28, 2008 2:06 PM:
It was "interesting" that Orangeburg (County), which is probably the 15th or 16th largest county in SC had TWO of the largest private, segregated schools in the state . . . "
fhsmct wrote on Nov 28, 2008 1:34 PM:
This is America and so be it.
However, if the private school he speaks of were to expand to the enrollment level(s) of public schools, I sincerely believe that the cost of tuition and fees would significantly increase.
Furthermore, in an national educational environment where it is already a constant struggle finding, empploying and maintaining instructors, does he really believe that lower salaries and no benefits is the answer?
Tuition at OCA's local, larger counterpart, OPS, ranges from $408 (preschool/kindergarden) to $1824 (5th - 12th grades) higher than the $3000 at OCA and that doesn't include "fees".
I am the child, grandchild, nephew and cousin of a loooong line of dedicated, competant, professional career educators who entered and stayed in the profession as a labor of love. Even in retirement, some of them still work as volunteer tutors, gratis.
However, I really can't see any of them having been able to realistically remain in the profession had their salaries been much lower, as Mr Connor hints at/implies.
AND, I would gander that the average instructor at OCA has a working spouse or some other source of income.
According to the sole source I could find, OCA has 10 instructors for 13 grade levels (Kinder - 12th grades) and somewhere around 126 students. At that rate, tuition brings in $37,800 per instructor which must be divied up between salaries, operational costs, insurance, and other costs of doing business.
I and many others really don't feel that education is the line item where we should cut corners.
Also, unfortunately, not everyone can afford private school, tax break or no tax break. Orangeburg's public school system has produced a long line of successful people, many of whose familes probably could not have afforded to send them to a private school even with a tax break.
Private school: all well and good if you can afford it but let's not short change the larger population of kids who attend public educational institutions . . . "