ON THE WEBSITE:

• HANNA UPDATES: Latest on the storm headed for S.C.
• PET CORNER: News, SPCA listing and more
• ELITE 11 2008: An in-depth look at the region's best
• PET IDOL: Enter your pet in the search for the best

Fair and 71° F

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Shampooer bill highlights overregulation

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

1 comment(s) | Default | Large

ISSUE: ‘Shampooer Protection Act’

OUR VIEW: Less-government governor would clean up regulations

Gov. Mark Sanford stays on message about government: it cost people too much and is too controlling of people’s lives. On Wednesday, the governor had some fun in the process of making his point.

“South Carolina took one giant step toward cleaner, shinier, healthier hair today with Gov. Mark Sanford’s signature of H.3803, a new law removing the legal requirement for shampooers to receive the same state-mandated 1,500 hours of training that cosmetologists receive,” Sanford’s office announced.

The governor could not resist going further:

“While we’re having some fun with this bill today, it does raise a serious issue about overregulation in South Carolina, which in a lot of cases is more about protecting the profits of people in a particular industry rather than protecting the consumer,” Sanford said. “Other times, laws are outdated or just plain silly. But the bottom line is that we need to take a serious look at places where we can peel back unnecessary government interference, and we need to do it in a way that takes as little time away from more pressing issues as possible.”

To the point, Sanford said the bill that got his signature, “unfortunatley,” does nothing to address the fact that state law requires 1,500 hours of training to be a cosmetologist - almost four times the amount of state-required training to become a police officer. State law requires 396 hours of training to become an officer and only eight to carry a concealed weapon.

The requirement does seem excessive.

But check out the “Top 10 Crazy Laws or Proposals” compiled by Sanford’s people, with the cosmetology training requirement being No. 1:

2. Caskets and stones: A retail funeral store in Greenwood submitted a license application, paid the fee, was scheduled to go before the Board of Funeral Directors and was told it could open. But then the board gave it a “cease and desist” order, essentially telling the firm to stop selling caskets. The board fined the business $1,500 for “opening before their Board appointment.” The business had to pay it before getting a license.

3. Fortune tellers are required to obtain a special permit in order to operate in South Carolina.

4. A proposed bill would require high school football and basketball playoff games to have replay for officials to use during games.

5. Barbering schools are required by law to have at least 10 instructional chairs -- and those chairs are required by law to be upholstered and finished exactly the same way.

6. In 2003, a bill was introduced that would have required all drinking straws in South Carolina be sold in individual wrappers. The bill almost led to a fist fight on the House floor.

7. The fourth Friday in October of each year is designated by law in public schools as Frances Willard Day, and each public school is required “to prepare and render a suitable program on the day to the end that the children of the state may be taught the evils of intemperance.”

8. Circuses cannot exceed 48 hours at one place in any one year.

9. If a menu or advertisement states “frozen dessert,” it must correctly state the specific frozen dessert that is offered for sale so as not to mislead the consumer.

10. Musical instruments are not allowed to be sold on Sunday.

“Whatever happened to common sense?” the governor asks.

Well, add to the list the broader issue of the state’s contradictory and discriminatory blue laws on Sunday sales and the governor has got a mini-agenda for change. Indeed, what happened to common sense?

 
1 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

kmitchell29307 wrote on May 17, 2008 1:50 PM:

" I think I can speak for most if not all of Cosmetologists in SC on the "shampooers protection act". If a lay person (one not trained in safety and sanitation of Cosmetology) were to enter a salon and want to shampoo hair for a living, isn't it scary to think these peoples could spread lice, scabies, HIV contagious scalp conditions to you or your loved ones? If you all allow people to become shampooers without the proper training our communittees are in for an epidemic of unthinking diseases. If they are required to get 100 or so hours in safety and sanitation that is different, but there is not mention of that. Also I was told that Gov. Sanford is recommending that the SC no longer have a board. If this is so, we are again going to suffer much in the communicable diseases. This is so scary to think an educated panel could risk their loved ones lives by enacting these laws. Think about it! "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

More Opinion