Gov. defers to SCSU trustees on Hugine, spokesman says
By LEE TANT, T&D Staff WriterFriday, December 28, 2007Gov. Mark Sanford does not support South Carolina State University trustees' decision to remove Dr. Andrew Hugine as president so much as he defers to the board's judgment, the governor's spokesman said.
Spokesman Joel Sawyer said it is not Sanford's job to evaluate Hugine's performance.
"The governor believes the way the system is set up is for the board to make those decisions and you defer to them. The people on the board are a lot more involved than the governor and the legislature," Sawyer said. He added that personnel matters concerning colleges and universities are handled at the discretion of their boards.
Saturday's edition of the Charleston Post and Courier carried a story with the headline, "S.C. State board gets Gov. Sanford's support."
Sawyer said that was not an endorsement of the board's action by Sanford, but rather a statement that people should defer to the government closest to the situation, in this case the S.C. State trustees.
Earlier this month, the S.C. State board voted 7-3 with one abstention to not renew Hugine's contract and place him on administrative leave until his last day, Jan. 4. The board selected Dr. Leonard McIntyre as the interim president.
The General Assembly elects 12 of the 13 members of the S.C. State board. Six of those 12 are elected by congressional district, with another six being selected at-large.
The governor appoints one trustee. Trustee Marsha Smith of Columbia is Sanford's appointee to the board, serving since May 2003.
S.C. State Board Chairman Maurice Washington was elected by the General Assembly to represent the Sixth Congressional District.
Sawyer said Sanford has known Washington for years in a public capacity, but their interaction has primarily involved policy. Washington served on Sanford's transition team in 2002 and also on his inaugural committee in 2006. Sanford also endorsed Washington during his failed bid to unseat Charleston Sen. Robert Ford in 2004.
Sawyer also responded to the allegations made by Washington that political pressure was applied on board members to retain Hugine.
"We can't speak for what elected officials try to involve themselves in. Other people in public policy are free to make their decisions in that regard," Sawyer said.
State Rep. John Scott said recently some lawmakers upset at Hugine's removal are considering actions including removing the board, restructuring the board and removing individual members.
"That's a matter for the General Assembly to decide," Sawyer said.
T&D Staff Writer Lee Tant can be reached by e-mail at ltant@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-534-1060. Discuss this and other stories online at TheTandD.com.


minimouse wrote on Jan 3, 2008 5:13 PM:
sweatr wrote on Jan 2, 2008 6:41 PM:
confisussum wrote on Jan 2, 2008 3:18 PM:
MINIMOUSE wrote on Dec 31, 2007 4:56 PM:
No one is forced to go to public schools.If you want to pay for your child to go to private school that is your perogitive. Public education would look a lot different in SC if all the rich and church people had put their kids in public schools after desegregation and spent their money and energy on making them the best schools possible.
Now however we have private school supporters coming full circle from then and demanding that government pay for their separate form of education.Again! "
sweatr wrote on Dec 31, 2007 1:01 PM:
confisussum wrote on Dec 31, 2007 11:38 AM:
CONCERNED04 wrote on Dec 30, 2007 10:29 PM:
CONCERNED04 wrote on Dec 30, 2007 10:28 PM:
nvs1 wrote on Dec 30, 2007 5:19 AM:
Bmore#1 wrote on Dec 29, 2007 6:37 AM:
Chris' Cloths wrote on Dec 29, 2007 3:41 AM:
honest wrote on Dec 29, 2007 1:22 AM:
minimouse wrote on Dec 28, 2007 6:39 PM:
minimouse wrote on Dec 28, 2007 6:31 PM:
confisussum wrote on Dec 28, 2007 4:12 PM:
minimouse wrote on Dec 28, 2007 3:15 PM:
Public education has no friend in "Mr Vouchers for private schools." "
db wrote on Dec 28, 2007 9:00 AM: