* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Gone in a minute: Farlow protest rejected Attorney says he didn't miss noon deadline to appeal

By LEE TANT, T&D Staff Writer  Tuesday, November 27, 2007

14 comment(s) | Default | Large

The S.C. Election Commission is refusing to hear the appeal of an Orangeburg Consolidated School District 5 election, saying it was filed one minute too late.

The attorney for Samuel Farlow, who lost his bid for re-election to the school board, filed his appeal of the Nov. 6 election at 12:01 p.m. Monday, according to the state Election Commission. The deadline was noon.

"The appeal was filed, but it was not timely," said commission spokesman Chris Whitmire.

Whitmire said that Willie Brunson, Farlow's attorney, was told the appeal was filed too late, and that particular ruling will be affirmed in writing to him.

Farlow and former OCSD 5 Board Chairman Kalu Kalu challenged their election losses in hearings before the Orangeburg County Elections Board last week. The board rejected both challenges. While Kalu conceded, Farlow decided to continue with his appeal.

Farlow lost Seat 2 on the OCSD 5 board to Robert "Bo" Gathers by a margin of 446 votes to 423.

On Monday, Farlow said he could not comment on the state Election Commission's decision until he consulted with Brunson on the matter.

Brunson said he talked to the commission's secretary earlier that morning. However, he said when he arrived at the commission's office, she was not at the front desk.

When the secretary returned to her post, the clock on the wall still said noon, Brunson said. He said that the secretary then told him that she goes by the clock on a computer, which read 12:01 p.m. at the time.

Brunson said he argued that the time on the clock on the wall was the commission's notice to the public of the proper time, and suggested that the computer clock could very well be inaccurate.

"I vehemently objected at the scene. I've never been so disappointed in my life. It's a travesty," Brunson said. Brunson said he will file a motion to make an exception.

Brunson said he did not submit the appeal sooner because of the Thanksgiving holiday.

He submitted an eight-page brief to the commission for consideration in which he claimed there were several violations of state election laws, including uncounted ballots, incorrect official reports, malfunctioning voting machines and inappropriate procedure at a protest hearing.

During last week's protest hearing, two members of the Orangeburg County Elections Board voted in favor of Farlow, resulting in a tied vote. They later changed their votes after returning from executive session.

County Attorney D'Anne Haydel said there were no deliberations during that executive session, and it was only called to get an opinion from the state Election Commission on how to proceed.

Gathers said he is patiently waiting to take his seat, saying that both the people and the county elections board have spoken.

"I'm ready to take on the challenge. It's past time for change and everybody wants to see some results," Gathers said.

Whitmire said the election results will be forwarded to the S.C. Secretary of State for final ce.jpgication. Last week, the OCSD 5 board adjourned its meeting early due to the fact that the three newly elected trustees had yet to be ce.jpgied by the state and could not be sworn in to office.

"Once we hear back from the state as to whether the votes have been ce.jpgied, we will bring everybody on board at the next board meeting," said OCSD 5 spokesman Greg Carson. The next board meeting is scheduled for Dec. 11 at Bethune-Bowman Middle-High School.

T&D Staff Writer Lee Tant can be reached by e-mail at ltant@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-534-1060. Discuss this and other stories online at TheTandD.com.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
14 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

got2know wrote on Nov 30, 2007 1:30 PM:

" Bo knows more than victory he is an outstanding citizen of our community,I remember when Bo took responsibility for a little boy and mentored him.Bo treated that little boy like it was his own.Bo loved that boy and he was always there for him.Thanks Bo for being a Father to that boy when he needed one.The young man attends church with mr bo and he just loves mr. BO.mR.Bo iam coming to church on sunday and i want you to be there so i can stand up in church and let that child be recognize with you.We need you on the board because you love children. "

swillabill wrote on Nov 28, 2007 9:38 PM:

" My apologies "mini" if you felt that I was speaking directly to you. I just had an overall feeling after reading the posts that a conspiracy theory was being promoted. I agree that a one minute missing of the deadline is quite strict. But isnt one mile over the speed limit still speeding? "

minimouse wrote on Nov 28, 2007 8:16 PM:

" 12 hours between postings is an awful long time to wait. Can't the micro-managing editor just provide basic guidelines for lower positions to follow and let the majority of post thru on a 4-5 hour basis? control freaks dont make good board managers. "

confisussum wrote on Nov 28, 2007 9:34 AM:

" I too have seen the folks sitting in chairs at each polling location, passing out sample ballots. I had always wondered about their affiliation. Curious as to why this has never been addressed before? It does seem a bit odd that Farlow's attorney waited so long to file the appeal. I am sure they had adequate time. By delaying the business of the board, doesn't this effort seem to do more harm than good to the children of the district. "

Reasonable wrote on Nov 27, 2007 11:01 PM:

" THE MAIN ISSUE AT HAND IS SCHOOL DISTRICT 5. DISTRICT 5 AS A WHOLE IS NOT DOING SO WELL WHEN IT COMES TO MEETING OBJECTIVES MANDATED BY THE STATE OF S.C.. HONESTLY, MR.GATHERS WON'T DO MUCH MORE THAN WHAT MR.FARLOW DID. OUR SCHOOLS ARE NOT MAKING THE GRADES FOR VARIOUS REASONS. 1) PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IS AT AN ALL TIME LOW. ATLEAST 60% TO 70% OF OUR KIDS COME FROM SINGLE PARENT HOMES OR EITHER GRANDMA OR AUNTI IS TRYING TO FILL IN FOR THE BIOLOGICAL PARENTS. THIS FACTOR ALONE CAUSES MANY KIDS NOT TO CARE ABOUT THEIR OWN EDUCATIONAL CIRCUMSTANCE. 2)ALSO MANY GREAT TEACHERS ARE LEAVING THE FIELD OF EDUCATION OR JUMPING TO BETTER PAYING DISTRICTS ( MANY OF OUR RETIRING EDUCATORS ARE NOT BEING REPLACED BECAUSE MANY COLLEGE KIDS ARE NOT PURSUING DEGREES IN EDUCATION). 3) TEACHERS NO LONGER TEACH TO THE "CHILD," THEY TEACH TO THE TEST (P.A.C.T.). AS A RESULT KIDS ARE LEARNING IN FRAGMENTS. THE AVERAGE MIDDLE SCHOOLER DOES NOT KNOW HIS OR HER MULTIPLICATION TIME TABLES. THERE ARE OTHER FACTORS THAT HAVE CAUSED OUR DISTRICTS TO DECLINE, I.E. (GANG INVOLVEMENT) AND THE LACK OF BLACK POSITIVE MALES AS ROLE MODELS IN THE COMMUNITY. IF MR.FARLOW, AND OTHER BOARD MEMBERS PUT THE SAME AMOUNT OF ENERGY AND URGENCY INTO IMPROVING OUR SCHOOLS AS HE IS PUTTING INTO FIGHTING HIS APPEAL, THEN MAYBE OUR SCHOOL SCHOOL DISTRICT WOULD IMPROVE. MR.FARLOW IT IS TIME TO STOP THINKING ABOUT "SELF." (MOVE FORWARD) THE PEOPLE WANT CHANGE, IT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT THAT ALL 3 INCUMBENTS WERE VOTED OUT. I WISH YOU THE BEST IN YOUR FUTURE ENDEAVORS. "

minimouse wrote on Nov 27, 2007 9:47 PM:

" Yo swill, I didn’t say or mean to imply that I thought the election commission was involved in a conspiracy. I wish they had allowed the appeal to go forward so that it could have been rejected for its lack of merit. To claim it was just because it missed a deadline by 60 seconds was a childish cop out don’t you think? Have a Great day. "

justice wrote on Nov 27, 2007 8:42 PM:

" To the contrary, it is my understanding that Mr. Farlow and his attorney did not wait to file one minute after the deadline. They did not want to continue the controversy. Rather, the attorney arrived before noon and had to wait for an Election Commission employee who came to accept the motion one minute after noon (according to the computer clock not the clock on the wall). I don't think the Election Commission is involved in any conspiracy since conspiracy is an act involving a group or entitites plotting together. Based on this employee ignoring a clock visible to the public and this employee not promptly serving the public, the Election Commission was wrong all by itself. "

swillabill wrote on Nov 27, 2007 7:40 PM:

" You people and your conspiracy theories are hilarious. Just exactly how would the state election commission benefit from "fixing" this inconsequential election? If it was so important to Farlow and his attorney, why didn't they file the motion earlier than one minute after the deadline. Obviously they waited to continue the controversy. Charges of harassment are more opinion than fact. Why would this be any different than the NAACP offering up ballots at the entrance to election places that are pre-marked and given to only black voters? "

got2know wrote on Nov 27, 2007 6:06 PM:

" I cant believe that we the people think this is about bo or farlow,this is bigger than that,our rights were violated and votes were not counted.the reason the state is acting stupidly is because they want to be apart of even bigger vote stealing.come on people something is wrong here.+ "

minimouse wrote on Nov 27, 2007 4:56 PM:

" sc election commission already knew they would reject the appeal when lucky for them the deadline was missed by one minute. Offering the missed deadline as the reason the appeal was rejected is childish. I hope one day the strict down to the minute rule comes back to bite them in the butt. "

justice wrote on Nov 27, 2007 2:17 PM:

" If persons were harassed while voting, no one including Mr. Farlow, should let it go. If machines malfunctioned, no one including Mr. Farlow, should let it go. If votes were cast but not counted, no one including Mr. Farlow, should let it go. While life continues in other aspects even in Consolidated School District 5, there has been a major injustice here. I applaud the will and the decency to right a wrong. I wish we all had that will and decency but apparently not. Finally, victory is determined when there is right. As such, there is no victory here. "

SCJustice wrote on Nov 27, 2007 1:49 PM:

" The only thing I can say is that the people HAVE spoken. The school board was not effective in the past and I seriously doubt that Robert "Bo" Gathers or any of the other elected persons will make a difference in the sad state of affairs that the district schools are in. "

candy1 wrote on Nov 27, 2007 1:42 PM:

" The Eagle...if you put your time and effort into something and ended up loosing by only 23 votes would you just let it go...or go on with your life? Would you be that big of a quitter???? Mr. Farlow has every right to ask for a recount. He "supposedly" lost by only 23 votes. I keep reading the quote that the people of Orangeburg have spoken... the people were not all that convince if the votes were that close!!! If it was me I would demand the same thing. I've worked the polls and I have seen first hand how human mistakes can be made. If everything was done on the up and up why not recount the votes. Is someone afraid that the outcome may be different the second time. If you’re confident about your win why not let them recount the votes? "

The Eagle wrote on Nov 27, 2007 10:47 AM:

" Mr. Farlow needs to get on with his life. The people of Orangeburg Consolidated Schools #5 has let it be know that we don't wont him. Yes you are dissapointed, so what, you lost now move on. "Bo" knows victory. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.
Farlow




More News