ON THE WEBSITE:

• HANNA UPDATES: Latest on the storm headed for S.C.
• PET CORNER: News, SPCA listing and more
• ELITE 11 2008: An in-depth look at the region's best
• PET IDOL: Enter your pet in the search for the best

Overcast and 77° F

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

DOT seeks to fill wetlands for Clyburn connector

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

1 comment(s) | Default | Large

T&D Staff and Wire Reports

State transportation officials have asked permission to fill three acres of wetlands along the route of a proposed bridge over Lake Marion.

Last week’s request will likely set off a major skirmish between proponents of the bridge and environmentalists, who say it will damage Sparkleberry Swamp, a 16,000-acre wetland at the north end of Lake Marion.

“We will do everything in our power to block this bridge from being built,” said Jane Lareau, who has tracked the project for the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League.

The biggest proponent of the bridge to connect the small towns of Lone Star and Rimini is U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., who said he will fight for the project.

“I’m prepared to wait it out,” Clyburn said. “I’m a very patient man.”

The bridge is a vital connection between Orangeburg and Sumter and would bring jobs to one of the poorest areas of the state, Clyburn said.

The dispute has gone on for years, but requesting a wetlands permit is an important step to starting construction.

The Department of Transportation has moved ahead with the project over the years because Clyburn keeps getting federal money. Clyburn estimates the government has earmarked more than $25 million for the bridge. The state figures it will cost $75 million to $100 million to build the nine-mile Briggs-DeLaine-Pearson Connector, which would include a 2.8-mile bridge over the lake.

Last month, S.C. Wildlife Federation President Angela Viney wrote to the S.C. Department of Transportation to oppose federal funding for the project.

“The proposed Briggs-DeLaine-Pearson Connector is not a transportation need. ... Approximately $25 million of unexpected earmarks for the Briggs-DeLaine-Pearson Connector are inaccessible for the true transportation needs in South Carolina — at a time when SCDOT has projected funding shortfalls of more than $48 billion for ’20 Year Needs,’” she wrote.

The permit request was filed Friday with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It would affect 15 acres of wetlands, with three acres being filled.

The corps will accept public comment until March 6 and will likely hold a public hearing before deciding whether to grant the permit, spokeswoman Carol Weart said.

Environmental groups are gearing up for a fight. They say Sparkleberry Swamp is one of the few places in South Carolina free of noise from cars and airplanes.

In 2000, the Sierra Club named the swamp one of South Carolina’s most significant natural areas in need of protection.

“This will be one of the hardest-fought permit disputes this state has seen,” said David Farren, an attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center. “I’ve not been involved in any project in South Carolina with more across-the-board interest from the environmental community.”

And it probably won’t end quickly.

Before construction of the bridge could begin, the transportation department would have to assure the project would not ruin water quality.

After that, Farren said conservation groups probably would appeal the decision to federal court, which could tie things up for several more years. “I don’t think a permit will ever be issued for that bridge,” Farren said.

 
1 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

A concern citizen wrote on Feb 9, 2006 2:10 PM:

" Briggs Delaine Pearson Connector. I thought it was so suppose to be the Clyburn Connector. Now that the name as been changed the project can go forward. As the younger generation would say, " What's up with that? " "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

More News